Here's the general idea of an environmental site investigation, in  a simple example, with you as the investigator.

1. During the site assessment walkover, you  observe a 55-gallon drum in the corner of a retaining wall. One of the bungs in  the drum lid is missing. There's a smaller drum behind it; same situation. Looks  like the drums were used to collect waste liquids from inside the facility.

2. You see wet rags with a petroleum odor  sitting on top of the drum. The liquid (or rainwater, since the bungs were  missing) has filled both drums up to the top. There are oily streaks down the  side of each drum. The ground is visibly stained. Einstein's assistance is  probably not going to be required here.

3. You take a sample from the large drum.  This is best done with a coliwasa (half-inch diameter glass tube 36-inches long)  to get a good view of layers. The coliwasa shows a 3-inch dark layer (probably  oil) on top of a lighter layer (probably water). You repeat the sampling for the  small drum. Small drum smells like petroleum solvent, large drum like cutting  oil.

4. You pour the samples from  both coliwasas into sample jars, and let them sit for awhile for the layers to  fully separate. Both jars develop separate layers, but the sample from the large  drum (on the right) tends to leave more color in the water layer. This implies  some solubility, so the oil is probably water-soluble cutting oil.

5. The next logical questions are how much  contamination has gotten into the soil, what is it, and how far down did it  penetrate. You use an auger to core a hole down into the soil, and collect soil  samples at depths of 6, 18, 36 and 48 inches below the surface. (Deeper than 6  ft with hand tools requires patience and strong shoulders.) You send these  samples to the lab for analysis.

6. The lab analysis of the  soil samples shows that the small drum contained waste petroleum solvent  (mineral spirits), and the large drum contained a mixture of lubricating and  cutting oils, with low levels of a chlorinated degreasing solvent  (trichloroethylene). Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the four soil samples  decreases with depth.

 

 

7. From this investigation, you conclude that  the soil is contaminated to a depth between 3 and 4 ft. By comparing the  laboratory results to Connecticut cleanup standards, you conclude that soils  from the surface down to the 3-ft depth should be excavated in order for this  site to be considered clean.

 

 

 

Who needs an environmental site investigation?

  • A recipient of an environmental site assessment report that unequivocally  recommends a site investigation, names specific areas of environmental concern,  and says why;
  • A buyer or seller who wants to determine possible environmental liabilities;
  • A bank or other lender who wants to be sure that the assigned equity value  reflects the environmental condition of the property.

Examples of site investigation methods. There are several methods and  technologies typically used for site investigations. Use of hand tools as  described above is rare for anything other than shallow depths; usually the  equipment is a drivable sampler (GeoProbe), a drill rig or a backhoe. Two common  methods are illustrated by:

  • A slide show sequence illustrating subsurface investigation by backhoe trenching  (annotated to show the kind of features that geophysical scientists and  engineers look for).
  • A slide show illustrating a soil gas  survey (for an actual investigation), which show a method for defining areas  of soil contamination by volatile compounds, such as solvents or gasoline.

 

 

free web counter 

Hot Topic Archive